by kingaling42 on Fri Mar 19, 2010 12:52 pm
Hobbs is still worthless so far as I'm concerned and at some point he needs to get motivated- that is entirely on him, I feel we'll never know though & he is wasting a scholarship as far as I can see it- he doesn't make the team better in practices/workouts/games with his energy or body language- he just sits there- critical or what not- there's just no tangible benefit to him being on the team.. I stand by my comments firmly.
I think that in late game situations the team relies on leaders to take over- the fact that you bring the HP game into play actually confirms to me that the team didn't trust Sean all year in that role which is pretty much my biggest knock on Sean as a senior- his lack of leadership... otherwise I can tell you that guys like Josh Pittman, Kevin Martin, Andre Smith, Bryan Smithson, KJ Garland, and others... would have the ball no matter what & that the team would make every effort to get them the ball as well to win or lose with that guy you trust in late game situations- the fact of the matter is that JP & Dickey seem to be the leaders of the team.. I don't think it's rocket science to see that those guys, especially being primary ball handlers had the ball in many late game situations not just that HP game alone for that very reason.. how many games did JP & Dickey win for us down the stretch of games with either key field goals or clutch free throws.. or should we exchange our 75/81% FT shooters for a guy shooting 63%?? They missed in the HP game & also in that same WU game you mentioned.. but how many others did they make those late game shots..
JW & Eric have the opportunity right now to become the leaders of next year's team.. I know that first hand, as you've pointed out I was a big time bench warmer but I also was a team co-captain in 1997 for a reason- I organized pick up games the spring/summer before that year, rode lazy players a$$es to get them into the weightroom & got the guys together for other functions & party's.. I didn't play hardly much that same year but I earned the respect of the guys I played with & helped to make our teams better most everyday- so you don't have to be a starter or be the next Josh Pittman to be a leader of the team- all you need is the heart, desire & love for your team to do the best with what you're given.. I will always have problems with talented players with no heart that act like they don't give a sh!t about my alma mater.. & they can come see me personally if they have a problem with that- I'm easy to find..
It would seem to me that as a member of this board & if you really had independent thoughts (because it seems you get your info from guys on the team that you defend here for obvious reasons)- that you would have shared those thoughts during game threads for conversation- not just spouting out some random moments from the season at this point in relation to a developing Verbal committment- As for the HP game you do realize that in many inbounds plays the inbounder is the guy that defenses tend to forget about & plays are many times designed for the inbounder to get the ball back, right? I'm not at all saying that the play was designed to do that, but either way sometimes scorers serve as great decoys- the bottom line is that that is not your call nor is it mine or anyone else's playing coach on the internet- Eddie has to live with his decisions & sometimes players have to actually believe in what they're doing, we know that some if not many had problems with plays/attitudes-.. that's fine I get it- you're friends with the folks you defend or whatever.. Players have choices, they can stay, play & commit to the system in place or they can move on.. you just can't have much success as a team if players are doing both.. that did happen early, we played poorly- but I know that some player's attitudes turned around in the season & it also corresponds with the success the team had thereafter.. Perhaps that is coaching too...